Monday, May 3, 2010
Being Beautiful
Why just me????
Friday, April 30, 2010
Surfing
Monday, April 19, 2010
Living among a world of narcissists:
The term narcissism refers to the set of traits that coincide with ‘self-image ego’ and ‘egotism’ as a whole. Healthy and rational narcissism is existent among all individuals; however it is generally used to denote a negative connotation. Facebook as well as other social networking sites have designed themselves to make it more acceptable for our society to become exceedingly narcissistic. Through social networking sites, people have become increasingly consumed with self-importance, vanity, and conceit. Entitlement is prevalent among narcissists, causing them to hold an unreasonable expectation of particularly favorable treatment. ‘Status updates’ portray the desire for automatic compliance among many people because they deem themselves as uniquely special. It’s discouraging how easily lead, ignorant, and self-absorbed the general public has become.
Friday, April 16, 2010
Tattoos
Relaxation
There are points in my everyday life where I am stripped of these few precious hours of peace. These are the days where I have more than one sporting event or have a tremendous amount of homework that must be finished and if I were to take the time to do them I would be up till two in the morning completing the tasks. The following days are always rough due to the lack of sleep, but the only way for them not to be rough is to take that nap and inevitably miss work that you will have to do at the end of that day.
Soon enough the stress will bog me down so much that it is difficult to get up and do even the easiest of tasks. It will last all the way into the weekend where I can finally have time to myself. Relaxation is, what I believe, the key to a long and happy life. However, what time you put into work will always turn into time that you can relax in the future.
Facebook Stalking 101
My fellow facebook creepers, for the sake of not being labeled as a psycho, there is a certain etiquette of stalking one should follow.
Number one: Don't randomly add and/or message people because you "think" you saw them somewhere.
Just because you've seen this person at the mall or in school, that doesn't mean that they want to be your friend. Especially on facebook. They're only going to see your friend request and say "Who the heck is Mike from x city, New Jersey?" You are a stranger and they don't want to talk to you. Facebook is not an icebreaker; although some of you who have resulted in a relationship because of facebook might disagree. Which further adds to the reason why you are a complete loser.
Example:
The other day, I received this special message from an unfamiliar name:
(Side note: "the other day" really was like 2 months ago in which also counts as "the other day" for Maria.)
Facebook stalker sent you a message.
Subject: Wh4ZZUp M0MMi!?
i tHinK i SAW y0OU aT tHe "x" MALL tHe 0ThER D4Y N i tH0GhT y0U W4S C00oOte! I SAW y0U 0N Mii FRiEND ShAY PAGE N Th0UGHt I Sh0Uld ADd Y0U N SAY WhAtZ GOo0DiE?!
Not only was that excruciatingly painful to read, it was a pure example of idiocy. I don't even know anyone named Shay. However, aside from you being a graduate at "x" high school, you also work at the mall you mentioned in your special note. On top of that, you work at "x" store where I purchased a pair of shoes that I paid with my debit card. You didn't "randomly" come across my page. You jotted my name down and in addition to you freaking me out, you also deterred me from ever going to that store again. Axxhole.
Number two: Don't mention to people that you don't talk to (i.e. acquaintances) that you stalk them on facebook.
The other day, I ran into someone I haven't talked to in a while and we briefly caught up. The conversation went something like this:
Facebook Creeper: Oh hey, Maria! I haven't seen you in 2 years! What's been going on?
Maria: Hey! I been good. School, Crew, and work. Same shxt, different day, you know? I just got hired at "x" place at the mall.
Facebook Creeper: Oh yeah, I saw your status update.
I haven't seen this person in two years.. Don't sneakily add the fact that you are keeping tabs/creeping on me on facebook.
Number three: Stop checking your ex's page!
Leave them alone. There's a reason you're not together! And stop commenting their pictures, activity, or liking their status! You are blatantly pointing out the fact that you are stalking them! Not in the rules of facebook stalking etiquacy.
Number four: You don't know me just because you see me on facebook!
I think people don't realize that they become scarily addicted to reading people's status updates. You don't talk to me in real life, don't comment on my facebook. Just because I was too lazy to block you, doesn't mean I don't think you are a creeper. And just because we like the same things and/or have the same interests, doesn't mean that I am your friend. Get off my page.
Number five: Stop freaking poking me!
I don't even know you, so why are you poking me? It only makes me think about the fact that you went through your list of friends, clicked on my name, possibly checked out my page, and clicked "Poke Maria Guillen" right under my picture. You're scaring me and I am not poking you back.
Number six: Who cares who is dating who?
This is facebook, not a tabloid magazine. Facebook is so popular for displaying broken relationships. And people are so obviously interested in seeing relationships fall apart via status updates. Although it might be a guilty pleasure of yours that no one knows about, you're still a stalker. If you are so interested in whose on-and-off again relationship is rapidly going down the drain, read a tabloid.
I'm obviously ranting.
Discussable question: Are you a facebook stalker? (Don't lie and say you're not. I have already established that we all are.) How so?
And feel free to add more facebook stalking rules! :)
Thursday, April 15, 2010
What Is Normal ?
Growing Up!
Picture Perfect
the way we look
Senior Year
Where'd common sense go?
Music
Spoiled
Now when I go out and look around I see and hear kids screaming because they want something but their parents won't buy it. Then just to shut them up their parents give it to them anyway! That is why I think kids are disrespectful, because instead of teaching them they can't have everything, and that life isn't always fair like most of us were taught, their parents just give them what they want so they'll stop crying and leave them alone.
The kids I babysit are the same way. They think they can have everything and if I don't give it to them they scream. The one boy cried for and hour because I didn't stir his macaroni and cheese right, and refused to make an entirly new box just so I can stir it the right way.
They now listen to me more then they listen to their parents.
Do you think this is why kids are how they are? or do you have a different opinion?
Wednesday, April 14, 2010
Life after high school
disrespect
Beautiful vs. Fine
Changes
People suck
Pass the beer?
Let's be honest, that's pretty widespread in Oakcrest. Hell, I think that's pretty widespread among pretty much almost every high school, but if you think about it hard enough, why is it like that?
What is it about alcohol that makes us teenagers go crazy? Is it because it's fun? You get together with a bunch of friends, throw back a few beers and before you know it you're streaking down main street and the next day you wake up with a fake tattoo of a pirate on your neck and some guy named Ben wrote his name all over your arms and legs. (true story)
Why is it, we teenagers can't seem to wait until we're 21 to get drunk? It's legal then. There aren't any repercussions age wise and we'll be able to get into bars and clubs without having to use our older siblings fake ID's.
Is it because it's cool? Are we really all so lame that we fall under the influence of peer pressure and images? I like to think my fellow teenagers are a little better than that, but I can't help but think underage drinking is all about the image after seeing some sophomore girl upload twelve pictures, all of them with her and a red cup.
Personally, I'm not really one to talk. I'll be the first to admit I've engaged in under aged drinking. Why did I do it though? Yeah, sure, it's fun and I do have a few stories that would be fun to tell in class, but I really couldn't wait until I was old enough and maybe a little more mature?
I'm not victim to image, trust me. Anything I do, I could care less how it makes me look. I don't drink because I think it makes me cool. In fact, if someone's taking a picture of me and I have a beer in my hand I make sure it's out of frame 'cause I got my dad added on Facebook and he don't need to see those things, you know?
I can't really say I do it for fun. Sure, there is a certain sense of entertainment in drinking with your friends, but the hangover the day after really isn't even worth it.
Is it a social sort of thing? I meet people via parties, so maybe that's it.
I guess my question would be; Why do you think teenagers drink as much as they do?
Dash
The High School Expereince
Life's Responsibility
Tuesday, April 13, 2010
keep your laws off my guns
Chicken or the Egg
Laws Limiting Abortions
"Struggle"
Our Generation!
The whole conversation was about a boy that he saw in the mall with the tightest straight-leged pants on. Now I can understand why he laughed, because sometimes they do look alittle extra with the stuff they wear. Then again it can look nice also. The whole point is that the clothes that we wear today is completly different then what we use to wear around my freshman year. Do we get influenced by what we see on tv, in the music videos, what we see other people wear. Or do we just follow our own thing and wear what we want and not just what we see?
Thursday, April 8, 2010
Engagement Ring Etiquette
Well, clearly things have changed. Women are not property, but we do have a timeline for being marketable. Young women have a better chance of getting married off when their still fertile and still pretty, so if a man takes her “off the market” for any reasonable amount of time, the ring should serve as compensation, no?
Well, the judge didn’t agree with me. On March 30, Justice F. Dana Winslow ruled that the bride had to return the ring, saying state law allows a person to get property back that was given “in contemplation of marriage” and that “fault in the breakup of an engagement is irrelevant.” What do you think? Do you agree with the judge’s decision?
Friday, March 12, 2010
Baby Shoes
Another reason I’m not too torn up about living in my bad neighborhood is because I’m not a mother. I’d be a little upset if I had to bring up my children there. Obviously, my future child’s safety would be foremost in my mind. But I’d also be disappointed that I could not provide a more picturesque environment for my child’s upbringing. I had a yard to play in as a little girl, and a swing set, and a pool and a playhouse. I think I would feel guilty about denying my child the opportunity to have those things. But obviously, sometimes, it can’t be helped.
The other day, when I was lugging my groceries up the three flights of stairs to our apartment, I happened to pause on the second floor, a little out of breath. I noticed one of my neighbors letting herself into her apartment, flanked by her two little kids. The two little kids, who were one and two years old, or there about, were waiting patiently to go inside. I don’t know why I noticed, because I never usually look very hard at little kids, but it occurred to me that both her children were wearing UGGs. My first thought was “Oh, I didn’t know that they made UGG’s for babies.” But my next thought was somewhat more judgmental. “ I would never spend THAT much money on shoes for a baby. “ I said to myself. I mean really, how much walking do they really do?
It seemed really crazy to me, but I wasn’t offended right away. It’s a free, Capitalistic country after all, people can spend their money on whatever they want. But, out of curiosity I looked online to see how much a pair of baby UGG’s would set me back. The UGG booties (for tiny babies) cost about forty-four dollars, but the bigger ones (for toddlers) were closer to sixty-five dollars. One hundred and thirty dollars total for two pair of shoes that your kids will probably grow out of by next winter. Like I said, it seemed crazy to me, but what really seemed crazy is spending that kind of money on a little kid’s shoes when those little kids are stuck living in a crappy neighborhood. Great they have nice shoes, but how much use will they get out of them since they can never go outside? Call me crazy, but I like to think that I would manage my money a little differently if I had a child to consider. Something tells me my two year old won’t mind if I get him a thirteen dollar pair of shoes from Kids “R” Us. My question for you though is this: Is there a right way to be poor? And if there is, do most people do it right?